TORONTO, ONTARIO–(Marketwired – Oct. 26, 2016) – Barrick Gold Corporation (NYSE:ABX)(TSX:ABX)
All amounts expressed in US dollars
- Barrick reported net earnings attributable to equity holders of Barrick (“net earnings”) of $175 million ($0.15 per share), and adjusted net earnings1 of $278 million ($0.24 per share), for the third quarter.
- The Company reported revenues of $2.30 billion in the third quarter, and net cash provided by operating activities (“operating cash flow”) was $951 million. Barrick generated $674 million in free cash flow2 in the third quarter.
- Gold production in the third quarter was 1.38 million ounces, at a cost of sales applicable to gold of $766 per ounce, and all-in sustaining costs3 of $704 per ounce.
- We have increased our gold production guidance for 2016 to 5.25-5.55 million ounces, up from our original range of 5.00-5.50 million ounces.
- Cost of sales applicable to gold is expected to be $800-$850 per ounce for the full year. We have reduced our 2016 all-in sustaining cost3 guidance to $740-$775 per ounce, marking three consecutive quarters of improved full-year cost guidance.
- Total debt has been reduced by $1.4 billion year-to-date, and we remain on track to achieve our $2 billion debt reduction target for the year.
- We are partnering with Cisco for the digital reinvention of our business, beginning with the development of a flagship digital operation at Cortez.
- During the quarter, we appointed Mark Hill as Barrick’s first Chief Investment Officer, bringing added consistency and rigor to all capital allocation decisions at the Company.
- We also appointed George Bee to evaluate a Lama starter project, with the potential to become the first stage of a phased development plan for Pascua-Lama.
Barrick Gold Corporation (NYSE:ABX)(TSX:ABX) (“Barrick” or the “Company”) today reported net earnings of $175 million ($0.15 per share) for the third quarter, and adjusted net earnings1 of $278 million ($0.24 per share).
Robust cash flow generation and low all-in sustaining costs3 in the third quarter reflect our focus on productivity, efficiency, cost management, and capital discipline. Through our collaboration with Cisco, we will leverage digital technologies and innovation to unlock even more value, while improving decision-making and performance across the entire organization.
We remain on track to reduce our debt by $2 billion this year. With a stronger balance sheet, we will be better able to withstand gold price volatility, with greater flexibility to invest in our business to grow free cash flow per share over the long term. In support of this objective, we are growing margins at our existing operations through innovation and productivity improvements, and we are advancing a deep pipeline of internal growth projects, many of which are located at or near existing operations and infrastructure. At the same time, we are continuously evaluating external opportunities. The appointment of Mark Hill as the Company’s first-ever Chief Investment Officer will bring added consistency and rigor to all capital allocation decisions. Ultimately, our objective is to grow free cash flow per share by allocating capital to opportunities that align with our strategic focus, and meet our 15 percent hurdle rate at a gold price of $1,200 per ounce. By doing so, we intend to deliver superior long-term value to our owners through metal price cycles.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Third quarter net earnings were $175 million ($0.15 per share), compared to a net loss of $264 million ($0.23 per share) in the prior-year period. Adjusted net earnings1 for the third quarter were $278 million ($0.24 per share), compared to $131 million ($0.11 per share) in the prior-year period. Higher earnings compared to the prior-year period reflect higher gold prices, and a decrease in operating costs, driven by lower fuel and energy prices, favorable foreign exchange movements, as well as the divestment of higher-cost mines. In addition, earnings benefited from lower exploration, evaluation, and project expenses, primarily driven by lower spending at Goldrush and Pascua-Lama, partially offset by the loss of earnings from divested sites, and higher income tax expense.
Significant adjusting items (pre-tax and non-controlling interest effects) in the third quarter of 2016 include:
- $49 million in impairment charges, and $37 million in disposition on sale losses, primarily related to the write-down of our equity investment in Zaldívar based on final purchase price adjustments;
- $34 million in insurance proceeds relating to the 2015 oxygen plant motor failure at Pueblo Viejo;
- $30 million in losses on debt extinguishment; and
- $19 million in unrealized foreign currency translation losses, primarily related to the Argentine peso.
Third quarter revenues were $2.30 billion, compared to $2.32 billion in the prior-year period. Operating cash flow in the third quarter was $951 million, compared to $1.26 billion in the third quarter of 2015. Higher operating cash flow in the prior-year period reflects the accounting treatment of $610 million in proceeds from our gold and silver streaming arrangement with Royal Gold. Excluding the proceeds from that transaction, operating cash flow for the third quarter of 2016 was $306 million higher than the prior-year period, despite lower production due to non-core asset sales.
Free cash flow2 for the third quarter was $674 million, marking six consecutive quarters of positive free cash flow. In the first nine months of 2016, we have generated approximately $1.13 billion in free cash flow2, despite lower production due to non-core asset sales. This demonstrates the impact of our driving focus on capital discipline, improved operational efficiency and productivity, and stronger cost management, underpinned by our Best-in-Class approach.
In connection with a continuous disclosure review by the Ontario Securities Commission, the Company has included additional disclosure with respect to its first and second quarter 2016 results in its third quarter Management Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A”) to provide greater prominence to the Company’s GAAP measures for those periods, including segment by segment GAAP reconciliations, and GAAP cost guidance on a segment by segment basis for those periods. The additional disclosure can be found on pages 63 and 73 of our MD&A.
RESTORING A STRONG BALANCE SHEET
Strengthening our balance sheet is a top priority, and we remain on track to achieve our $2 billion debt reduction target for 2016. During the third quarter, we reduced our total debt by $461 million, and have completed more than $1.4 billion in debt repayments year to date, representing over 70 percent of our debt reduction target for the year. We expect to achieve our 2016 debt reduction target using existing cash balances and fourth quarter operating cash flow.
The Company’s liquidity position is strong and continues to improve, underpinned by robust free cash flow generation across the business, and modest near-term debt repayment obligations. In the first nine months of 2016, the Company generated $1.93 billion in operating cash flow, and $1.13 billion in free cash flow.2
At the end of the third quarter, Barrick had a consolidated cash balance of approximately $2.6 billion.4 The Company now has less than $200 million5 in debt due before 2019, and about $5 billion of our outstanding debt of $8.5 billion does not mature until after 2032. Over the medium term, we aim to reduce our total debt to below $5 billion.
OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS AND OUTLOOK
Our over-arching objective as a business is to grow our free cash flow per share. In support of this objective, our Best-in-Class approach is focused on driving industry-leading margins across three pillars. The first is business improvement, a continuous effort to make existing processes and systems as efficient as possible. The second is step changes, making fundamental changes to existing processes and systems, in ways that push performance beyond current limits. The third is innovation, which involves redesigning and reimagining systems and processes to achieve levels of performance not possible using existing methods and technology. We are now advancing a pipeline of initiatives across each of these pillars, reflected in falling costs, greater productivity, and improved capital discipline with each passing quarter. Our aspiration is to achieve and maintain all-in sustaining costs of $700 per ounce or lower by 2019.
Barrick produced 1.38 million ounces of gold in the third quarter at a cost of sales of $766 per ounce, compared to 1.66 million ounces at a cost of sales of $829 per ounce in the prior-year period. All-in sustaining costs3 in the third quarter were $704 per ounce, compared to $771 per ounce in the third quarter of 2015.
Compared to the first nine months of 2015, cost of sales applicable to gold declined by seven percent. Over the same period, all-in sustaining costs3 have fallen by 16 percent.
Please see page 36 of Barrick’s third quarter MD&A for individual operating segment performance details.
We now expect full-year gold production of 5.25-5.55 million ounces, up from our original estimate of 5.00-5.50 million ounces. Cost of sales applicable to gold is anticipated to be in the range of $800-$850 per ounce. We have reduced our all-in sustaining cost3 guidance for 2016 to $740-$775 per ounce, down from $750-$790 per ounce at the end of the second quarter, and below our original 2016 guidance of $775-$825 per ounce. Please see Appendix 1 of this press release for individual mine site guidance updates.
Capital expenditures for 2016 are now expected to be $1.20-$1.30 billion, down from $1.25-$1.40 billion at the end of the second quarter, and below our original 2016 guidance range of $1.35-$1.65 billion.
| Gold | Third Quarter 2016 |
Current 2016 Guidance |
Original 2016 Guidance |
||
| Production6 (000s of ounces) | 1,381 | 5,250-5,550 | 5,000-5,500 | ||
| Cost of sales applicable to gold ($ per ounce) | 766 | 800-850 | N/A | ||
| All-in sustaining costs3 ($ per ounce) | 704 | 740-775 | 775-825 | ||
| Cash costs3 ($ per ounce) | 518 | 540-565 | 550-590 | ||
| Copper | |||||
| Production6 (millions of pounds) | 100 | 380-430 | 370-410 | ||
| Cost of sales applicable to copper ($ per pound) | 1.47 | 1.35-1.55 | N/A | ||
| All-in sustaining costs7 ($ per pound) | 2.02 | 2.00-2.20 | 2.05-2.35 | ||
| C1 cash costs7 ($ per pound) | 1.50 | 1.40-1.60 | 1.45-1.75 | ||
| Total Capital Expenditures8 ($ millions) | 271 | 1,200-1,300 | 1,350-1,650 |
Veladero Update
Operations at the Veladero mine in Argentina were suspended from September 15 until October 4 after falling ice damaged a pipe carrying process solution in the leach pad area, causing some material to leave the leach pad. This material, primarily crushed ore saturated with process solution, was contained in the area of the mine where the incident occurred, and returned to the leach pad. Extensive water monitoring in the area confirmed the incident did not result in any environmental impacts. The Company immediately completed a series of remedial works required by provincial authorities, including increasing the height of the perimeter berms that surround the leach pad, to prevent such an incident from occurring again.
In addition to these works, and in keeping with our vision for a digital Barrick, we are making Veladero a trial site for digital technology that will enhance our environmental and water monitoring activities, while also providing greater transparency to authorities and communities.
Reflecting the impact of this temporary suspension, along with adverse weather conditions, we now expect 2016 production from Veladero to be in the range of 530,000-580,000 ounces of gold, down from our previous guidance of 580,000-640,000 ounces. Cost of sales applicable to gold at Veladero is now expected to be in the range of $820-$900 per ounce for 2016. All-in sustaining cost3 guidance has been increased slightly to $800-$870 per ounce, from the previous range of $790-$860 per ounce.
Copper
Copper production in the third quarter was 100 million pounds at a cost of sales attributable to copper of $1.47 per pound, and all-in sustaining costs7 of $2.02 per pound.
We continue to expect copper production for 2016 in the range of 380-430 million pounds, at a cost of sales applicable to copper between $1.35-1.55 per pound. Copper all-in sustaining cost7 guidance for 2016 has been narrowed to $2.00-$2.20 per pound.
DIGITAL BARRICK UPDATE
During the quarter, we announced that we are partnering with Cisco to drive the digital reinvention of our business. Through this collaboration, we will harness digital technology to unlock value across our business, helping us grow our cash flow per share by enhancing productivity and efficiency at our mines, and improving decision-making and performance across our business. Just as importantly, digital technology will allow us to reduce our environmental impact, and be even more transparent with our local partners, including communities, local governments, and NGOs.
Our collaboration with Cisco is strategic: we are working together to define opportunities and-by combining our knowledge, networks, and resources-to develop new technology solutions.
We have already begun working together to develop a flagship digital operation at the Cortez mine in Nevada-embedding digital technology throughout the mine to deliver better, faster, and safer mining. Ultimately, the goal at Cortez is to redefine best-in-class mining.
With the Cortez test case proven, Cisco will support us as we transform our entire business over time-bringing digital technology to all of our mines, as well as to our head office. New digital tools will permit Barrick’s leaders to make decisions with greater speed, precision, and productivity, and will better equip the Company to assess and mitigate risk.
Overall, our approach to digital reinvention is similar to that used in agile software development. Work is phased, a proof-of-concept is demonstrated, and if it succeeds, it receives more funding so it can be swiftly implemented and accelerated. If a project is not delivering benefits within six weeks, we will make adjustments, or stop. This approach minimizes upfront capital and execution risk.
We will apply the same rigor and scrutiny to digital projects as we would for any other capital allocation decision. All significant investments will need to be approved by our Investment Committee.
We have earmarked approximately $100 million for digital projects in 2016 and 2017. This is money we will invest directly in our business. Our Investment Committee has approved the first wave of digital projects at the Cortez mine with a budget of up to $50 million in 2016 and 2017. These include:
- The implementation of a short-interval control system underground. The system, commonly employed in manufacturing, will use sensors to ensure that both people and equipment are performing according to plan, and at the highest level, driving improvements in daily tonnage rates and labor productivity. Any deviations from plans can be immediately identified, addressed, and resolved.
- The implementation of a tele-remote system. Equipment operators will no longer spend significant time traveling between the surface and the operating face-time during which equipment sits idle. Instead, they will operate underground equipment (including drills, road-headers, loaders, and haul trucks) from a comfortable, centralized control room on the surface, using reliable and continuous data feeds to inform their decisions. These changes are expected to improve overall productivity, and decrease operating costs, while reducing the number of people underground.
- The digitization of maintenance management. The mine will implement a tablet-based digital workflow and task-management system that will replace the existing paper-based system. These changes are expected to increase equipment availability, and reduce unplanned maintenance work, leading to lower parts inventory, improved continuity of production, and lower operating costs.
- The automation of the processing plant. The mine will implement an advanced operating control system at the processing plant, building on recent system upgrades to optimize crushing, grinding, and carbon leaching and handling circuits for improved gold recovery.
- The consolidation of data. The mine will connect up to 150 distinct systems and data sources to one data management platform, which will enable better analysis, planning, and decision-making.
In parallel with these projects, we have also begun to explore how to leverage digital technologies to streamline the permitting process, with better transparency.
Planning for the next wave of projects will continue in parallel with the implementation of the current, first wave.
PROJECT UPDATE
The Pascua-Lama project, located on the border between Chile and Argentina, is one of the world’s most attractive undeveloped gold and silver deposits, with the potential to generate significant free cash flow over a long mine life. During the third quarter, we announced the appointment of George Bee as Senior Vice President for Lama and Frontera District Development. Mr. Bee and his team are now advancing a scoping study on the use of underground mining methods for a Lama starter project on the Argentinean side of the Pascua-Lama project. Such a project could represent the first stage of a phased development plan for Pascua-Lama. Concurrently, the team in Chile remains focused on optimizing the Chilean components of the project, while addressing outstanding legal, regulatory, and permitting matters.
Our Investment Committee will continue to scrutinize the project as it advances, applying a high degree of consistency and rigor-as we do for all capital allocation decisions at the Company-before further review by the Executive Committee and the Board at each stage of advancement.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
The scientific and technical information contained in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Steven Haggarty, P. Eng., Senior Director, Metallurgy of Barrick, who is a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
APPENDIX 1 – Updated 2016 Operating and Capital Expenditure Guidance
| GOLD PRODUCTION AND COSTS | |||||||
| Production (millions of ounces) |
Cost of sales ($ per ounce) |
All-in sustaining costs3 ($ per ounce) |
Cash costs3 ($ per ounce) |
||||
| Goldstrike | 1.050-1.100 | 860-900 | 720-760 | 570-590 | |||
| Cortez | 1.000-1.050 | 880-920 | 510-530 | 420-440 | |||
| Pueblo Viejo (60%) | 0.670-0.700 | 630-660 | 520-540 | 400-410 | |||
| Veladero | 0.530-0.580 | 820-900 | 800-870 | 560-610 | |||
| Lagunas Norte | 0.425-0.450 | 680-720 | 560-590 | 400-430 | |||
| Sub-total | 3.700-3.900 | 790-840 | 620-650 | 480-500 | |||
| Acacia (63.9%) | ~0.520 | 890-930 | 950-980 | 670-700 | |||
| KCGM (50%) | 0.350-0.375 | 760-810 | 700-750 | 630-680 | |||
| Turquoise Ridge (75%) | 0.255-0.275 | 600-650 | 650-700 | 500-540 | |||
| Porgera (47.5%) | 0.230-0.250 | 790-860 | 850-920 | 650-700 | |||
| Hemlo | 0.215-0.230 | 780-830 | 830-880 | 660-700 | |||
| Golden Sunlight | 0.030-0.045 | 1,220-1,420 | 1,200-1,250 | 1,050-1,150 | |||
| Total Gold | 5.250-5.5509 | 800-850 | 740-775 | 540-565 | |||
| COPPER PRODUCTION AND COSTS | |||||||
| Production (millions of pounds) |
Cost of sales ($ per pound) |
All-in sustaining costs7 ($ per pound) |
C1 cash costs7 ($ per pound) |
||||
| Zaldívar (50%) | 100-120 | 1.95-2.15 | 2.10-2.30 | 1.60-1.80 | |||
| Lumwana | 270-290 | 1.10-1.20 | 1.80-2.10 | 1.20-1.50 | |||
| Jabal Sayid (50%) | 10-20 | 2.10-2.90 | 2.80-3.10 | 1.90-2.20 | |||
| Total Copper | 380-430 | 1.35-1.55 | 2.00-2.20 | 1.40-1.60 | |||
| CAPITAL EXPENDITURES | |||||||
| ($ millions) | |||||||
| Mine site sustaining | 1,050-1,100 | ||||||
| Project10 | 150-200 | ||||||
| Total Capital Expenditures | 1,200-1,300 | ||||||
APPENDIX 2 – 2016 Outlook Assumptions and Economic Sensitivity Analysis
| 2016 Guidance Assumption | Hypothetical Change |
Impact on Revenue (millions) | Impact on Cost of sales (millions) |
Impact on All-in sustaining costs3,7 |
||||||
| Gold revenue, net of royalties | $1,250/oz | +/- $100/oz | +/- $123 | n/a | +/- $3/oz | |||||
| Copper revenue, net of royalties | $2.10/lb | +/- $0.50/lb | +/- $50 | n/a | +/- $0.04/lb | |||||
| Gold all-in sustaining costs3 | ||||||||||
| Gold royalties & production taxes | $1,250/oz | +/- $100/oz | n/a | +/- $3 | +/- $3/oz | |||||
| WTI crude oil price11 | $45/bbl | +/- $10/bbl | n/a | +/- $2 | +/- $1/oz | |||||
| Australian dollar exchange rate | 0.76 : 1 | +/- 10% | n/a | +/- $7 | +/- $6/oz | |||||
| Canadian dollar exchange rate | 1.30 : 1 | +/- 10% | n/a | +/- $8 | +/- $6/oz | |||||
| Copper all-in sustaining costs7 | ||||||||||
| WTI crude oil price11 | $45/bbl | +/- $10/bbl | n/a | +/- $1 | +/- $0.01/lb | |||||
| Chilean peso exchange rate | 670 : 1 | +/- 10% | n/a | +/- $2 | +/- $0.02/lb | |||||
ENDNOTE 1
“Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial performance measures. Adjusted net earnings excludes the following from net earnings: certain impairment charges (reversals), gains (losses) and other one-time costs relating to acquisitions or dispositions, foreign currency translation gains (losses), significant tax adjustments not related to current period earnings and unrealized gains (losses) on non-hedge derivative instruments. The Company uses this measure internally to evaluate our underlying operating performance for the reporting periods presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future operating results. Barrick believes that adjusted net earnings is a useful measure of our performance because these adjusting items do not reflect the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Net Earnings per Share, Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings per Share
| ($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars) | For the three months ended September 30 | For the nine months ended September 30 | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company | $ | 175 | $ | (264 | ) | $ | 230 | $ | (216 | ) | |||||
| Impairment charges related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investments | 49 | 452 | 54 | 492 | |||||||||||
| Acquisition/disposition (gains)/losses | 37 | (54 | ) | 35 | (80 | ) | |||||||||
| Foreign currency translation (gains)/losses | 19 | (43 | ) | 181 | (12 | ) | |||||||||
| Significant tax adjustments1 | 5 | 7 | 59 | 39 | |||||||||||
| Other expense adjustments2 | 1 | 67 | 75 | 95 | |||||||||||
| Unrealized gains on non-hedge derivative instruments | (12 | ) | 3 | (23 | ) | 7 | |||||||||
| Tax effect and non-controlling interest | 4 | (37 | ) | (48 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings | $ | 278 | $ | 131 | $ | 563 | $ | 253 | |||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share3 | 0.15 | (0.23 | ) | 0.20 | (0.19 | ) | |||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings per share3 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.48 | 0.22 | |||||||||||
| 1 Significant tax adjustments for the current year primarily relate to a tax provision booked by Acacia in Q1 2016. |
| 2 Other expense adjustments for the current year relate to losses on debt extinguishment, the impact of the decrease in the discount rate used to calculate the provision for environmental remediation at our closed mines and a reduction in cost of sales attributed to insurance proceeds recorded in the third quarter of 2016 relating to the 2015 oxygen plant motor failure at Pueblo Viejo. |
| 3 Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share. |
ENDNOTE 2
“Free cash flow” is a non-GAAP financial performance measure which excludes capital expenditures from Net cash provided by operating activities. Barrick believes this to be a useful indicator of our ability to operate without reliance on additional borrowing or usage of existing cash. Free cash flow is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. Free cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow
| ($ millions) | For the three months ended September 30 | For the nine months ended September 30 | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 951 | $ | 1,255 | $ | 1,929 | $ | 2,096 | |||||||
| Capital expenditures | (277 | ) | (389 | ) | (800 | ) | (1,402 | ) | |||||||
| Free cash flow | $ | 674 | $ | 866 | $ | 1,129 | $ | 694 | |||||||
ENDNOTE 3
“Cash costs” per ounce and “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “Cash costs” per ounce is based on cost of sales but excludes, among other items, the impact of depreciation. “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce begins with “Cash costs” per ounce and adds further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, general & administrative costs and minesite exploration and evaluation costs. Barrick believes that the use of “cash costs” per ounce and “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce will assist investors, analysts and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, understanding the economics of gold mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “Cash costs” per ounce and “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS. Although a standardized definition of all-in sustaining costs was published in 2013 by the World Gold Council (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by 18 gold mining companies from around the world, including Barrick), it is not a regulatory organization, and other companies may calculate this measure differently. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to Cash costs, All-in sustaining costs and All-in costs, including on a per ounce basis
| ($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars) | For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
| Footnote | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||
| Cost of sales related to gold production | $ | 1,202 | $ | 1,491 | $ | 3,632 | $ | 4,329 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation | (373 | ) | (399 | ) | (1,107 | ) | (1,151 | ) | ||||||||||
| By-product credits | 1 | (59 | ) | (54 | ) | (143 | ) | (166 | ) | |||||||||
| Realized (gains)/losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives | 2 | 15 | 30 | 71 | 78 | |||||||||||||
| Non-recurring items | 3 | 34 | (61 | ) | 24 | (61 | ) | |||||||||||
| Other | 4 | (9 | ) | 7 | (24 | ) | 18 | |||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests (Pueblo Viejo and Acacia) | 5 | (92 | ) | (104 | ) | (267 | ) | (316 | ) | |||||||||
| Cash costs | $ | 718 | $ | 910 | $ | 2,186 | $ | 2,731 | ||||||||||
| General & administrative costs | 71 | 44 | 217 | 181 | ||||||||||||||
| Minesite exploration and evaluation costs | 6 | 10 | 11 | 26 | 36 | |||||||||||||
| Minesite sustaining capital expenditures | 7 | 236 | 342 | 646 | 1,056 | |||||||||||||
| Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites) | 8 | 16 | 43 | 41 | 119 | |||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other | 9 | (75 | ) | (119 | ) | (209 | ) | (276 | ) | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs | $ | 976 | $ | 1,231 | $ | 2,907 | $ | 3,847 | ||||||||||
| Project exploration and evaluation and project costs | 6 | 34 | 75 | 129 | 233 | |||||||||||||
| Community relations costs not related to current operations | 1 | 5 | 6 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Project capital expenditures | 7 | 35 | 42 | 124 | 181 | |||||||||||||
| Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (non-operating sites) | 8 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interest and copper operations | 9 | (7 | ) | (12 | ) | (38 | ) | (23 | ) | |||||||||
| All-in costs | $ | 1,041 | $ | 1,344 | $ | 3,135 | $ | 4,259 | ||||||||||
| Ounces sold – equity basis (000s ounces) | 10 | 1,386 | 1,596 | 3,984 | 4,447 | |||||||||||||
| Cost of sales per ounce | 11,12 | $ | 766 | $ | 829 | $ | 803 | $ | 863 | |||||||||
| Cash costs per ounce | 12 | $ | 518 | $ | 570 | $ | 549 | $ | 614 | |||||||||
| Cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) | 12,13 | $ | 550 | $ | 592 | $ | 575 | $ | 639 | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs per ounce | 12 | $ | 704 | $ | 771 | $ | 730 | $ | 866 | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) | 12,13 | $ | 736 | $ | 793 | $ | 756 | $ | 891 | |||||||||
| All-in costs per ounce | 12 | $ | 751 | $ | 842 | $ | 787 | $ | 958 | |||||||||
| All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) | 12,13 | $ | 783 | $ | 864 | $ | 813 | $ | 983 | |||||||||
| 1 | By-product credits |
| Revenues include the sale of by-products for our gold and copper mines for the three months ended September 30, 2016, of $50 million (2015: $32 million) and the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $110 million (2015: $106 million); energy sales from the Monte Rio power plant at our Pueblo Viejo Mine for the three months ended September 30, 2016, of $9 million (2015: $22 million) and the nine months ended September 30, 2016, of $33 million (2015: $60 million). | |
| 2 | Realized (gains)/losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives |
| Includes realized hedge losses of $15 million and $59 million (2015: $24 million and $66 million, respectively) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and realized non-hedge losses of $nil and $12 million (2015: $6 million and $12 million, respectively) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Refer to Note 5 of the Financial Statements for further information. | |
| 3 | Non-recurring items |
| Non-recurring items in 2016 consist of $34 million in a reduction in cost of sales attributed to insurance proceeds recorded in the third quarter of 2016 relating to the 2015 oxygen plant motor failure at Pueblo Viejo and $10 million in abnormal costs at Veladero. These gains/costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been excluded from the calculation of cash costs. | |
| 4 | Other |
| Other adjustments include adding the net margins related to power sales at Pueblo Viejo of $1 million and $5 million, respectively, (2015: $5 million and $10 million, respectively) and adding the cost of treatment and refining charges of $3 million and $12 million, respectively (2015: $3 million and $10 million, respectively). 2016 includes the removal of cash costs associated with our Pierina mine which is mining incidental ounces as it enters closure of $14 million and $42 million, respectively. | |
| 5 | Non-controlling interests (Pueblo Viejo and Acacia) |
| Non-controlling interests include non-controlling interests related to gold production of $124 million and $381 million, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 (2015: $168 million and $493 million, respectively). Refer to Note 5 of the Financial Statements for further information. | |
| 6 | Exploration and evaluation costs |
| Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite sustaining if it supports current mine operations and project if it relates to future projects. Refer to page 32 of our third quarter MD&A. | |
| 7 | Capital expenditures |
| Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are presented on a 100% accrued basis. They are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project capital expenditures are distinct projects designed to increase the net present value of the mine and are not related to current production. Significant projects in the current year are Arturo, Cortez Lower Zone and Lagunas Norte Refractory Ore Project. Refer to page 31 of our third quarter MD&A. | |
| 8 | Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization |
| Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provision of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites. | |
| 9 | Non-controlling interest and copper operations |
| Removes general & administrative costs related to non-controlling interests and copper based on a percentage allocation of revenue. Also removes exploration, evaluation and project costs, rehabilitation costs and capital expenditures incurred by our copper sites and the non-controlling interest of our Acacia and Pueblo Viejo operating segment and Arturo. In 2016, figures remove the impact of Pierina. The impact is summarized as the following: |
| ($ millions) | For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||
| General & administrative costs | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (48 | ) | |||
| Minesite exploration and evaluation costs | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
| Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization (operating sites) | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||
| Minesite sustaining capital expenditures | (63 | ) | (89 | ) | (167 | ) | (214 | ) | |||||||
| All-in sustaining costs total | $ | (75 | ) | $ | (119 | ) | $ | (209 | ) | $ | (276 | ) | |||
| Project exploration and evaluation and project costs | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (8 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
| Project capital expenditures | (4 | ) | (10 | ) | (30 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||
| All-in costs total | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | |||
| 10 | Ounces sold – equity basis |
| In 2016, figures remove the impact of Pierina as the mine is currently going through closure. | |
| 11 | Cost of sales per ounce |
| In 2016, figures remove the cost of sales impact of Pierina of $17 million and $52 million, respectively for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016, as the mine is currently going through closure. Cost of sales per ounce excludes non-controlling interest related to gold productions. Cost of sales related to gold per ounce is calculated using cost of sales on an attributable basis (removing the non-controlling interest of 40% Pueblo Viejo and 36.1% Acacia from cost of sales), divided by attributable gold ounces. | |
| 12 | Per ounce figures |
| Cost of sales per ounce, cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding. | |
| 13 | Co-product costs per ounce |
| Cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis remove the impact of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as: |
| ($ millions) | For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| By-product credits | $ | 59 | $ | 54 | $ | 143 | $ | 166 | |||||||
| Non-controlling interest | (14 | ) | (16 | ) | (40 | ) | (48 | ) | |||||||
| By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest) | $ | 45 | $ | 38 | $ | 103 | $ | 118 | |||||||
ENDNOTE 4
Includes $674 million cash held at Acacia and Pueblo Viejo, which may not be readily deployed outside of Acacia and/or Pueblo Viejo.
ENDNOTE 5
Amount excludes capital leases and includes project financing payments at Pueblo Viejo (60 percent basis) and Acacia (100 percent basis).
ENDNOTE 6
Barrick’s share.
ENDNOTE 7
“C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “C1 cash costs” per pound is based on cost of sales but excludes the impact of depreciation and royalties and includes treatment and refinement charges. “All-in sustaining costs” per pound begins with “C1 cash costs” per pound and adds further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, general & administrative costs and royalties. Barrick believes that the use of “C1 cash costs” per pound and “all-in sustaining costs” per pound will assist investors, analysts, and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing copper, understanding the economics of copper mining, assessing our operating performance, and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are intended to provide additional information only, do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS, and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Copper Cost of Sales to C1 cash costs and All-in sustaining costs, including on a per pound basis
| ($ millions, except per pound information in dollars) | For the three months ended September 30 | For the nine months ended September 30 | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Cost of sales | $ | 66 | $ | 209 | $ | 235 | $ | 698 | |||||||
| Depreciation/amortization1 | (10 | ) | (18 | ) | (30 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||
| Treatment and refinement charges | 36 | 46 | 120 | 129 | |||||||||||
| Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments2 | 68 | – | 154 | – | |||||||||||
| Less: royalties | (7 | ) | (15 | ) | (32 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||
| C1 cash cost of sales | $ | 153 | $ | 222 | $ | 447 | $ | 662 | |||||||
| General & administrative costs | – | 6 | 11 | 17 | |||||||||||
| Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Royalties | 7 | 15 | 32 | 85 | |||||||||||
| Minesite sustaining capital expenditures | 44 | 61 | 121 | 132 | |||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs | $ | 205 | $ | 306 | $ | 616 | $ | 902 | |||||||
| Pounds sold – consolidated basis (millions pounds) | 102 | 145 | 298 | 378 | |||||||||||
| Cost of sales per pound3,4 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.44 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.85 | |||||||
| C1 cash cost per pound3 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.75 | |||||||
| All-in sustaining costs per pound3 | $ | 2.02 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 2.08 | $ | 2.39 | |||||||
| 1 For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016, depreciation excludes $15 million and $34 million, respectively, of depreciation applicable to equity method investments. |
| 2 For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016, figures include $46 million and $131 million, respectively, of cash costs related to our 50% share of Zaldívar due to the divestment of 50% of our interest in the mine on December 1, 2015, as well as $23 million and $23 million, respectively of cash costs related to our 50% share of Jabal Sayid due to the divestment of 50% of our interest in the mine on December 4, 2014 and subsequent accounting as an equity method investments. |
| 3 Cost of sales per pound, C1 cash costs per pound and all-in sustaining costs per pound may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding. |
| 4 Cost of sales related to copper per pound is calculated using cost of sales including our proportionate share of cost of sales attributable to equity method investments (Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid), divided by consolidated copper pounds (including our proportionate share of copper pounds from our equity method investments). |
ENDNOTE 8
Barrick’s share on an accrued basis.
ENDNOTE 9
Operating unit guidance ranges for production reflect expectations at each individual operating unit, but do not add up to corporate-wide guidance range total.
ENDNOTE 10
We have combined our previous capital expenditure categories of Minesite expansion and Projects into one category called Project.
ENDNOTE 11
Due to our fuel hedging activities, which are reflected in these sensitivities, we are partially protected against changes in this factor.
| Key Statistics | Three months ended | Nine months ended | ||||||||||||
| Barrick Gold Corporation | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||
| (in United States dollars) | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
| Financial Results (millions) | ||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 2,297 | $ | 2,315 | $ | 6,239 | $ | 6,791 | ||||||
| Cost of sales | 1,291 | 1,742 | 3,951 | 5,139 | ||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss)1 | 175 | (264 | ) | 230 | (216 | ) | ||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings2 | 278 | 131 | 563 | 253 | ||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA2 | 1,196 | 942 | 2,778 | 2,465 | ||||||||||
| Total project capital expenditures3 | 35 | 42 | 124 | 198 | ||||||||||
| Total capital expenditures – sustaining3 | 236 | 342 | 646 | 1,056 | ||||||||||
| Operating cash flow | 951 | 1,255 | 1,929 | 2,096 | ||||||||||
| Free cash flow2 | 674 | 866 | 1,129 | 694 | ||||||||||
| Per Share Data (dollars) | ||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) (basic and diluted) | 0.15 | (0.23 | ) | 0.20 | (0.19 | ) | ||||||||
| Adjusted net earnings (basic)2 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.48 | 0.22 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average basic and diluted common shares (millions) | 1,165 | 1,165 | 1,165 | 1,165 | ||||||||||
| Operating Results | ||||||||||||||
| Gold production (thousands of ounces)4 | 1,381 | 1,663 | 4,001 | 4,498 | ||||||||||
| Gold sold (thousands of ounces)4 | 1,386 | 1,596 | 3,984 | 4,447 | ||||||||||
| Per ounce data | ||||||||||||||
| Average spot gold price | $ | 1,335 | $ | 1,124 | $ | 1,260 | $ | 1,178 | ||||||
| Average realized gold price2 | 1,333 | 1,125 | 1,259 | 1,176 | ||||||||||
| Cost of sales (Barrick’s share)5 | 766 | 829 | 803 | 863 | ||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs2 | 704 | 771 | 730 | 866 | ||||||||||
| Copper production (millions of pounds)6 | 100 | 140 | 314 | 373 | ||||||||||
| Copper sold (millions of pounds) | 102 | 145 | 298 | 378 | ||||||||||
| Per pound data | ||||||||||||||
| Average spot copper price | $ | 2.16 | $ | 2.39 | $ | 2.14 | $ | 2.58 | ||||||
| Average realized copper price2 | 2.18 | 2.18 | 2.17 | 2.44 | ||||||||||
| Cost of sales (Barrick’s share)7 | 1.47 | 1.44 | 1.42 | 1.85 | ||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs2 | 2.02 | 2.11 | 2.08 | 2.39 | ||||||||||
| As at September 30, | As at December 31, | ||||
| 2016 | 2015 | ||||
| Financial Position (millions) | |||||
| Cash and equivalents | $ | 2,648 | $ | 2,455 | |
| Working capital (excluding cash) | 1,200 | 1,310 |
| 1 | Net earnings (loss) represents net earnings attributable to the equity holders of the Company. |
| 2 | Adjusted net earnings, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, adjusted net earnings per share, realized gold price, all-in sustaining costs and realized copper price are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of each non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 49 – 62 of this MD&A. |
| 3 | Amounts presented on a 100% accrued basis. Project capital expenditures are included in our calculation of all-in costs, but not included in our calculation of all-in sustaining costs. |
| 4 | Production includes Acacia on a 63.9% basis and Pueblo Viejo on a 60% basis, both of which reflect our equity share of production. Also includes production from Bald Mountain and Round Mountain up to January 11, 2016, the effective date of sale of the assets. 2015 includes production from Porgera on a 95% basis up to August 2015 and on a 47.5% basis thereafter, whereas 2016 figures are on a 47.5% basis reflecting the sale of 50% of our interest in Porgera in third quarter 2015. Sales include our equity share of gold sales from Acacia and Pueblo Viejo. |
| 5 | Cost of sales per ounce (Barrick’s share) is calculated as cost of sales – gold on our share basis excluding Pierina divided by gold ounces sold. |
| 6 | In 2016, reflects production from Jabal Sayid and Zaldívar on a 50% basis, which reflects our equity share of production, and 100% of Lumwana. 2015 production includes Zaldívar on a 100% basis prior to the sale of 50% of the mine in fourth quarter 2015, and 100% of Lumwana. |
| 7 | Cost of sales per pound (Barrick’s share) is calculated as cost of sales – copper plus our equity share of cost of sales attributable to Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid divided by copper pounds sold. |
| Production and Cost Summary | ||||||||||||
| Production | ||||||||||||
| Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
| Gold (equity ounces (000s)) | ||||||||||||
| Goldstrike | 293 | 328 | 805 | 741 | ||||||||
| Cortez | 254 | 321 | 749 | 647 | ||||||||
| Pueblo Viejo1 | 189 | 172 | 511 | 438 | ||||||||
| Lagunas Norte | 101 | 108 | 325 | 441 | ||||||||
| Veladero | 116 | 143 | 367 | 443 | ||||||||
| Turquoise Ridge | 72 | 55 | 201 | 156 | ||||||||
| Acacia2 | 131 | 104 | 394 | 339 | ||||||||
| Other Mines – Gold3 | 225 | 432 | 649 | 1,293 | ||||||||
| Total | 1,381 | 1,663 | 4,001 | 4,498 | ||||||||
| Copper (equity pounds)4 (millions) | 100 | 140 | 314 | 373 | ||||||||
| Cost of Sales per unit (Barrick’s share) | ||||||||||||
| Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
| Gold Cost of Sales per ounce ($/oz)5 | ||||||||||||
| Goldstrike | $ | 805 | $ | 718 | $ | 841 | $ | 720 | ||||
| Cortez | 874 | 684 | 921 | 915 | ||||||||
| Pueblo Viejo1 | 521 | 854 | 612 | 890 | ||||||||
| Lagunas Norte | 651 | 792 | 661 | 664 | ||||||||
| Veladero | 905 | 908 | 861 | 795 | ||||||||
| Turquoise Ridge | 563 | 717 | 606 | 702 | ||||||||
| Acacia2 | 850 | 1,036 | 863 | 1,021 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 766 | $ | 829 | $ | 803 | $ | 863 | ||||
| Copper Cost of Sales per pound ($/lb)6 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.44 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.85 | ||||
| All-in sustaining costs7 | ||||||||||||
| Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
| Gold All-in sustaining costs ($/oz) | ||||||||||||
| Goldstrike | $ | 681 | $ | 558 | 706 | $ | 698 | |||||
| Cortez | 531 | 501 | 517 | 711 | ||||||||
| Pueblo Viejo1 | 425 | 554 | 509 | 628 | ||||||||
| Lagunas Norte | 530 | 581 | 557 | 510 | ||||||||
| Veladero | 651 | 914 | 693 | 957 | ||||||||
| Turquoise Ridge | 583 | 738 | 631 | 745 | ||||||||
| Acacia2 | 998 | 1,195 | 961 | 1,153 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 704 | $ | 771 | $ | 730 | $ | 866 | ||||
| Copper All-in sustaining costs ($/lb) | $ | 2.02 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 2.08 | $ | 2.39 | ||||
| 1 | Reflects production from Pueblo Viejo on a 60% basis, which reflects our equity share of production. |
| 2 | Reflects production from Acacia on a 63.9% basis, which reflects our equity share of production. |
| 3 | In 2016, Other Mines – Gold includes Golden Sunlight, Hemlo, Porgera on a 47.5% basis and Kalgoorlie. Also includes production from Bald Mountain and Round Mountain up to January 11, 2016, the effective date of sale of these assets. In 2015, Other Mines – Gold included Bald Mountain, Round Mountain, Golden Sunlight, Hemlo, Pierina, Cowal, Ruby Hill, Porgera on a 95% basis up to August 2015 and on a 47.5% basis thereafter, and Kalgoorlie. |
| 4 | In 2016, reflects production from Jabal Sayid and Zaldívar on a 50% basis, which reflects our equity share of production, and 100% of Lumwana. 2015 production includes Zaldívar on a 100% basis prior to the sale of 50% of the mine in fourth quarter 2015, and 100% of Lumwana. |
| 5 | Cost of sales per ounce (Barrick’s share) is calculated as cost of sales – gold on our share basis excluding Pierina divided by gold ounces sold. |
| 6 | Cost of sales per pound (Barrick’s share) is calculated as cost of sales – copper plus our equity share of cost of sales attributable to Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid divided by copper pounds sold. |
| 7 | All-in sustaining costs is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. For further information and a detailed reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure, please see pages 49 – 62 of this MD&A. |
| Consolidated Statements of Income | |||||||||||||
| Barrick Gold Corporation | |||||||||||||
| (in millions of United States dollars, except per share data) (Unaudited) | Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
| Revenue (notes 5 and 6) | $ | 2,297 | $ | 2,315 | $ | 6,239 | $ | 6,791 | |||||
| Costs and expenses (income) | |||||||||||||
| Cost of sales (notes 5 and 7) | 1,291 | 1,742 | 3,951 | 5,139 | |||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 71 | 44 | 217 | 181 | |||||||||
| Exploration, evaluation and project expenses | 44 | 86 | 155 | 269 | |||||||||
| Impairment charges (note 9B and 13) | 49 | 452 | 54 | 492 | |||||||||
| Loss (gain) on currency translation (note 9C) | 19 | (43 | ) | 181 | (12 | ) | |||||||
| Closed mine rehabilitation | 16 | (8 | ) | 46 | (19 | ) | |||||||
| Loss (income) from equity investees (note 12) | 3 | – | (5 | ) | – | ||||||||
| (Gain) loss on non-hedge derivatives | (4 | ) | 12 | (7 | ) | 23 | |||||||
| Other expense (income) (note 9A) | 39 | (45 | ) | 42 | (31 | ) | |||||||
| Income before finance costs and income taxes | $ | 769 | $ | 75 | $ | 1,605 | $ | 749 | |||||
| Finance costs, net | (189 | ) | (205 | ) | (562 | ) | (591 | ) | |||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 580 | $ | (130 | ) | $ | 1,043 | $ | 158 | ||||
| Income tax expense (note 10) | (335 | ) | (122 | ) | (694 | ) | (330 | ) | |||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 245 | $ | (252 | ) | $ | 349 | $ | (172 | ) | |||
| Attributable to: | |||||||||||||
| Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation | $ | 175 | $ | (264 | ) | $ | 230 | $ | (216 | ) | |||
| Non-controlling interests (note 17) | $ | 70 | $ | 12 | $ | 119 | $ | 44 | |||||
| Earnings (loss) per share data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation (note 8) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | |||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | 0.20 | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||
| Diluted | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | 0.20 | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||
| The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the Third Quarter Report 2016 available on our website are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | |||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | |||||||||||||||
| Barrick Gold Corporation | |||||||||||||||
| (in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 245 | $ | (252 | ) | $ | 349 | $ | (172 | ) | |||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes | |||||||||||||||
| Movement in equity investments fair value reserve: | |||||||||||||||
| Net unrealized change on equity investments, net of tax $nil, $nil, $nil and $nil | 5 | (3 | ) | 16 | (14 | ) | |||||||||
| Net realized change on equity investments, net of tax $nil, $nil, $nil and $nil | – | – | – | 18 | |||||||||||
| Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | |||||||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax $1, $30, ($6) and $31 | (4 | ) | (74 | ) | 8 | (107 | ) | ||||||||
| Realized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax ($2), ($8), ($6) and ($8) | 15 | 15 | 51 | 66 | |||||||||||
| Currency translation adjustments, net of tax $nil, $nil, $nil and $nil | 6 | (46 | ) | 99 | (76 | ) | |||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 22 | (108 | ) | 174 | (113 | ) | |||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 267 | $ | (360 | ) | $ | 523 | $ | (285 | ) | |||||
| Attributable to: | |||||||||||||||
| Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation | $ | 197 | $ | (372 | ) | $ | 404 | $ | (329 | ) | |||||
| Non-controlling interests | $ | 70 | $ | 12 | $ | 119 | $ | 44 | |||||||
| The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the Third Quarter Report 2016 available on our website are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | |||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||||
| Barrick Gold Corporation | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 245 | $ | (252 | ) | $ | 349 | $ | (172 | ) | |||||||
| Adjusted for the following items: | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 389 | 432 | 1,156 | 1,272 | |||||||||||||
| Finance costs | 192 | 207 | 572 | 597 | |||||||||||||
| Impairment charges | 49 | 452 | 54 | 492 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (note 10) | 335 | 122 | 694 | 330 | |||||||||||||
| (Gain) loss on non-hedge derivatives | (4 | ) | 12 | (7 | ) | 23 | |||||||||||
| Loss (gain) on sale of long-lived assets | 37 | (54 | ) | 35 | (80 | ) | |||||||||||
| Deposit on gold and silver streaming agreement | – | 610 | – | 610 | |||||||||||||
| Change in working capital (note 11) | (72 | ) | 4 | (364 | ) | (203 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other operating activities (note 11) | (119 | ) | (108 | ) | 55 | (54 | ) | ||||||||||
| Operating cash flows before interest and income taxes | 1,052 | 1,425 | 2,544 | 2,815 | |||||||||||||
| Interest paid | (45 | ) | (86 | ) | (313 | ) | (435 | ) | |||||||||
| Income taxes paid | (56 | ) | (84 | ) | (302 | ) | (284 | ) | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 951 | 1,255 | 1,929 | 2,096 | |||||||||||||
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | |||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures (note 5) | (277 | ) | (389 | ) | (800 | ) | (1,402 | ) | |||||||||
| Sales proceeds | 86 | 8 | 96 | 27 | |||||||||||||
| Divestitures (note 4) | – | 842 | 588 | 844 | |||||||||||||
| Investments sales | – | – | – | 33 | |||||||||||||
| Other investing activities | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (8 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (193 | ) | 458 | (124 | ) | (508 | ) | ||||||||||
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
| Debt | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds | – | 1 | 3 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Repayments | (465 | ) | (493 | ) | (1,445 | ) | (765 | ) | |||||||||
| Dividends | (21 | ) | (23 | ) | (64 | ) | (139 | ) | |||||||||
| Funding from non-controlling interests | 28 | 10 | 55 | 32 | |||||||||||||
| Disbursements to non-controlling interests | (64 | ) | (26 | ) | (95 | ) | (90 | ) | |||||||||
| Debt extinguishment costs | (30 | ) | – | (70 | ) | – | |||||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (552 | ) | (531 | ) | (1,616 | ) | (956 | ) | |||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents | 1 | (5 | ) | 4 | (12 | ) | |||||||||||
| Net increase in cash and equivalents | 207 | 1,177 | 193 | 620 | |||||||||||||
| Cash and equivalents at the beginning of period | 2,441 | 2,122 | 2,455 | 2,699 | |||||||||||||
| Add: cash and equivalents of assets classified as held for sale at the beginning of period | – | 20 | – | – | |||||||||||||
| Cash and equivalents at the end of period | $ | 2,648 | $ | 3,319 | $ | 2,648 | $ | 3,319 | |||||||||
| Less: cash and equivalents of assets classified as held for sale at the end of period | – | 2 | – | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Cash and equivalents excluding assets classified as held for sale at the end of period | $ | 2,648 | $ | 3,317 | $ | 2,648 | $ | 3,317 | |||||||||
| The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the Third Quarter Report 2016 available on our website are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | |||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | |||||||||
| Barrick Gold Corporation | |||||||||
| (in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | As at September 30, | As at December 31, | |||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||
| Current assets | |||||||||
| Cash and equivalents (note 14A) | $ | 2,648 | $ | 2,455 | |||||
| Accounts receivable | 465 | 275 | |||||||
| Inventories | 1,862 | 1,717 | |||||||
| Other current assets | 249 | 263 | |||||||
| Total current assets (excluding assets classified as held for sale) | $ | 5,224 | $ | 4,710 | |||||
| Assets classified as held for sale | – | 758 | |||||||
| Total current assets | $ | 5,224 | $ | 5,468 | |||||
| Non-current assets | |||||||||
| Equity in investees (note 12) | 1,169 | 1,199 | |||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 14,043 | 14,434 | |||||||
| Goodwill | 1,371 | 1,371 | |||||||
| Intangible assets | 273 | 271 | |||||||
| Deferred income tax assets | 1,014 | 1,040 | |||||||
| Non-current portion of inventory | 1,553 | 1,502 | |||||||
| Other assets | 981 | 1,023 | |||||||
| Total assets | $ | 25,628 | $ | 26,308 | |||||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||||
| Current liabilities | |||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 1,238 | $ | 1,158 | |||||
| Debt (note 14B) | 153 | 203 | |||||||
| Current income tax liabilities | 281 | – | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 287 | 337 | |||||||
| Total current liabilities (excluding liabilities classified as held for sale) | $ | 1,959 | $ | 1,698 | |||||
| Liabilities classified as held for sale | – | 149 | |||||||
| Total current liabilities | $ | 1,959 | $ | 1,847 | |||||
| Non-current liabilities | |||||||||
| Debt (note 14B) | 8,386 | 9,765 | |||||||
| Provisions | 2,385 | 2,102 | |||||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 1,555 | 1,553 | |||||||
| Other liabilities | 1,501 | 1,586 | |||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 15,786 | $ | 16,853 | |||||
| Equity | |||||||||
| Capital stock (note 16) | $ | 20,875 | $ | 20,869 | |||||
| Deficit | (13,482 | ) | (13,642 | ) | |||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (196 | ) | (370 | ) | |||||
| Other | 321 | 321 | |||||||
| Total equity attributable to Barrick Gold Corporation shareholders | $ | 7,518 | $ | 7,178 | |||||
| Non-controlling interests (note 17) | 2,324 | 2,277 | |||||||
| Total equity | $ | 9,842 | $ | 9,455 | |||||
| Contingencies and commitments (notes 5 and 18) | |||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 25,628 | $ | 26,308 | |||||
| The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the Third Quarter Report 2016 available on our website are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | |||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Barrick Gold Corporation | Attributable to equity holders of the company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | Common Shares (in thousands) | Capital stock | Retained deficit | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)1 | Other2 | Total equity attributable to shareholders | Non-controlling interests | Total equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At January 1, 2016 | 1,165,081 | $ | 20,869 | $ | (13,642 | ) | $ | (370 | ) | $ | 321 | $ | 7,178 | $ | 2,277 | $ | 9,455 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | – | – | 230 | – | – | 230 | 119 | 349 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income | – | – | – | 174 | – | 174 | – | 174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | – | – | 230 | 174 | – | 404 | 119 | 523 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transactions with owners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends | – | – | (64 | ) | – | – | (64 | ) | – | (64 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Funding from non-controlling interests | – | – | – | – | – | – | 55 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other decrease in non-controlling interest | – | – | – | – | – | – | (127 | ) | (127 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend reinvestment plan (note 16) | 350 | 6 | (6 | ) | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total transactions with owners | 350 | 6 | (70 | ) | – | – | (64 | ) | (72 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| At September 30, 2016 | 1,165,431 | $ | 20,875 | $ | (13,482 | ) | $ | (196 | ) | $ | 321 | $ | 7,518 | $ | 2,324 | $ | 9,842 | |||||||||||||
| At January 1, 2015 | 1,164,670 | $ | 20,864 | $ | (10,640 | ) | $ | (298 | ) | $ | 321 | $ | 10,247 | $ | 2,615 | $ | 12,862 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | – | – | (216 | ) | – | – | (216 | ) | 44 | (172 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total other comprehensive loss | – | – | – | (113 | ) | – | (113 | ) | – | (113 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | – | – | (216 | ) | (113 | ) | – | (329 | ) | 44 | (285 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Transactions with owners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends | – | – | (139 | ) | – | – | (139 | ) | – | (139 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Recognition of stock option expense | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | – | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Funding from non-controlling interests | – | – | – | – | – | – | 33 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other decrease in non-controlling interests | – | – | – | – | – | – | (95 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividend reinvestment plan | 127 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other decreases | – | – | (6 | ) | – | – | (6 | ) | – | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total transactions with owners | 127 | 2 | (145 | ) | – | – | (143 | ) | (62 | ) | (205 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| At September 30, 2015 | 1,164,797 | $ | 20,866 | $ | (11,001 | ) | $ | (411 | ) | $ | 321 | $ | 9,775 | $ | 2,597 | $ | 12,372 | |||||||||||||
| 1 Includes cumulative translation losses at September 30, 2016: $78 million (September 30, 2015: $198 million). |
| 2 Includes additional paid-in capital as at September 30, 2016: $283 million (December 31, 2015: $283 million; September 30, 2015: $283 million) and convertible borrowings – equity component as at September 30, 2016: $38 million (December 31, 2015: $38 million; September 30, 2015: $38 million). |
| The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the Third Quarter Report 2016 available on our website are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
| HEAD OFFICE | TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS |
| Barrick Gold Corporation | CST Trust Company |
| Brookfield Place | P.O. Box 700, Postal Station B |
| TD Canada Trust Tower | Montreal, Quebec H3B 3K3 |
| 161 Bay Street, Suite 3700 | or |
| Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1 | American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC |
| Telephone: +1 416 861-9911 | 6201 – 15 Avenue |
| Toll-free: 1-800-720-7415 | Brooklyn, New York 11219 |
| Fax: +1 416 861-2492 | Telephone: 1-800-387-0825 |
| Email: [email protected] | Fax: 1-888-249-6189 |
| Website: http://www.barrick.com/ | Email: [email protected] |
| Website: http://www.canstockta.com/ |
| SHARES LISTED |
| ABX – The New York Stock Exchange |
| The Toronto Stock Exchange |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this Third Quarter Report 2016, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “contemplate”, “target”, “plan”, “objective” “aspiration”, “aim”, “intend”, “project”, “goal”, “continue”, “budget”, “estimate”, “potential”, “may”, “will”, “can”, “should”, “could”, “would”, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this Third Quarter Report 2016 contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to: (i) Barrick’s forward-looking production guidance; (ii) estimates of future cost of sales per ounce for gold and per pound for copper, all-in-sustaining costs per ounce/pound, cash costs per ounce, and C1 cash costs per pound; (iii) cash flow forecasts; (iv) projected capital, operating, and exploration expenditures; (v) targeted debt and cost reductions; (vi) targeted investments by Barrick’s Growth Group; (vii) mine life and production rates; (viii) potential mineralization and metal or mineral recoveries; (ix) Barrick’s Best-in-Class program (including potential improvements to financial and operating performance that may result from certain Best-in-Class initiatives); (x) the Lama starter project and the potential for phased in development of the Pascua-Lama project; (xi) the potential impact and benefits of Barrick’s digital reinvention initiative; (xii) timing and completion of acquisitions; (xiii) asset sales or joint ventures; and (xiv) expectations regarding future price assumptions, financial performance, and other outlook or guidance.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this press release in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper, or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas, and electricity); the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration successes; risks associated with the fact that certain Best-in-Class initiatives are still in the early stages of evaluation and additional engineering and other analysis is required to fully assess their impact;
risks associated with the implementation of Barrick’s digital reinvention initiative and the ability of the projects under this initiative to meet the Company’s capital allocation objectives; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions, and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; uncertainty whether some or all of the Best-in-Class initiatives and investments targeted by the Growth Group will meet the Company’s capital allocation objectives; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit ratings; the impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls, or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property, and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States, and other jurisdictions in which the Company does or may carry on business in the future; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption, and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage, and civil disturbances; litigation;
contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power, and other required infrastructure; business opportunities that may be presented to, or pursued by, the Company; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions or complete divestitures; risks associated with working with partners in jointly controlled assets; employee relations including loss of key employees; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortage, related to climate change; availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor; and the organization of our previously held African gold operations and properties under a separate listed Company. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding, and gold bullion, copper cathode, or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks).
Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this Third Quarter Report 2016 are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release.
The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Senior Vice President, Investor Engagement and Governance
+1 416 307-7474
[email protected]
MEDIA CONTACT: Andy Lloyd
Senior Vice President, Communications
+1 416 307-7414
[email protected]
